The DMV May Have Seen Their Last Smiling Face

expired sfp driver’s license, originally uploaded by sir fanceepants
Let’s face it, when we have to make a trip to the DMV, there is usually little cause for smiling… Except perhaps for the photo portion. We figure, after going through such hell, the least we could have is a decent photo of ourselves to show to our local law enforcement when they pull us over for a ticket. To help with the current battle against fraud however, several states are ordering their grumpy bench waiters to cease that solitary grin and instead maintain a neutral scowl for their drivers license photo.
What this is exactly is a new campaign to fight against fraudulent licenses. When we go to renew our license, many states use a software program designed to scan the new photo and compare it to the old in the attempt to identify if someone is trying to receive a fraudulent identification. Sounds easy enough, but it turns out it doesn’t always work.
What happens is certain forms of computer driven software that the DMV uses to detect facial features, are unable to scan for the features as accurately when the faces they are comparing are smiling. These computers tend to see differences much more accurately when a photo depicts a neutral stare rather than a toothsome grin.
So far there are four states that have adopted this rule, Nevada, Virginia, Indiana, and Arkansas. Approximately 600 folks are caught each year in attempting to receive a fraudulent license, and the DMV hopes to catch even more by adopting this new ruling. There is talk of several other states adopting the “no smiles” rule, leaving your local DMV an even more non-joyous place to spend half the afternoon!
Okay, well we can deal with this as none of us wants to have our identity stolen. But there is a kicker to this story…
Not every DMV has the exact same system. Some states claim that their face recognition software works regardless of whether a person is smiling, smirking, scowling, or picking for golden nuggets. Pennsylvania, for example, claims that they will not be moving to a “no smile” rule, because quite simply, it is not necessary. So, wouldn’t it just be easier to adopt the same software in every state, rather than take away the few smiles a DMV clerk will see in a given day.
But, then again this is state government we are dealing with, and simplicity would be just too… well, darn simple!
Source: USA Today







